ABSTRACT
Background. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced the status of a global pandemic for the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Pregnant women are most vulnerable to being infected with COVID-19 and must take extra care of their health. The impact and risk of COVID-19 on pregnant and lactating women as well as on the fetus and baby are not yet known with certainty. However, due to changes in body shape and immune system, pregnant women are very susceptible to some res-piratory infections. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of antenatal care (ANC) services in Probolinggo Regency. Methods. This analytic research has a cross-sectional design. The participants are 326 pregnant women in the third trimester. Sampling uses simple random sampling. The sample is some pregnant women in the third trimester, as many as 179 people. Chi- square is used for analysis. Results. According to the study's findings, as many as 170 respondents did not confirm that they had COVID-19 (95%). 153 respondents were provided with quality ANC services (85%). Conclusion. The results of the statistical test obtained a value of P=0.09;so there is an influence during the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of ANC services. Efforts that can be made are health workers limit meetings with pregnant women without reducing the quality of ANC services.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.
ABSTRACT
Background: Risk perception and COVID‑19 anxiety in pregnant women restrict access to health services, cause pregnant women to resort to alternative channels such as the Internet, and affect prenatal care quality (PCQ) negatively. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of risk perception and COVID‑19 anxiety in pregnancy on decision‑making via the Internet (DMI) and PCQ with multivariate analysis. Materials and Methods: This cross‑sectional study was conducted with 406 pregnant women selected using the convenience sampling method in a training and research hospital, in Turkey. The data were collected using the information form, the perception of pregnancy risk questionnaire, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, the DMI Scale, and the PCQ Scale. The data obtained were subject to descriptive analysis and the multivariate analysis of variance. Results: Approximately 24.9% of the pregnant women were found to have a high perception of risk and 18% had symptoms of COVID‑19 anxiety. Pregnant women with high COVID‑19 anxiety and a higher perception of risk perceived the Internet as less influential for decision‑making (P < 0.05). Pregnant women with a high‑risk perception had lower PCQ (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The findings can be used to enhance mental health and resilience in pregnant women and to formulate appropriate intervention strategies. © 2023 Journal of Integrative Nursing ;Published by Wolters Kluwer ‑ Medknow.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has brought renewed public attention to food insecurity and other social determinants of health. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), food insecurity affects 10.5% of households nationwide. Our study sought to determine the prevalence of food insecurity at the University of Louisville and the effect that implementing food pantry amenities within the clinic has on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. We screened pregnant women presenting to our outpatient clinic for prenatal care each trimester. Food security was determined using a modified version of the USDA Adult Food Security Survey over the past 12 months. Women that were determined to be food insecure were provided access to food pantry amenities at each prenatal visit. Screening data were entered in REDCap, then exported into Stata for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Survey data demonstrated that 38% of our patients screened positive for food insecurity. As a result, a total of 5,829 lb of food have been distributed. Secondary outcomes including prenatal care adherence rates, weight gain during pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and birth outcomes will be displayed graphically. CONCLUSION: Rates of food insecurity in our clinic population were three times higher compared to the national average. Formal screening allows providers to better identify families experiencing food insecurity and connect them to food pantry amenities. Importantly, our initiative can serve as a guide for other institutions considering food security interventions. Implementing food pantries in academic institutions nationwide will enhance and inform these innovations to target at-risk populations and provide health equity. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A comprehensive screening at delivery revealed that roughly 14% of pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 did not exhibit any symptoms. The SARS-CoV-2 antigen swab test is frequently utilized as a diagnostic technique. Inadequate implementation of health protocol compliance can enhance the vulnerability of a community to the COVID-19 virus, according to previous findings. This suggests that these health protocol compliance and the vaccination program are important for preventing and controlling the spread of the virus. AIM: This study aims to determine the relationship of vaccination history and health protocol compliance with positive antigen swab results among pregnant women at the Community Health Center in Medan. METHOD(S): This is a cross-sectional and observational study that was conducted in February 2022 at the Community Health Center in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Two hundred pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria make up the sample population. Antigen sampling for SARS-CoV-2 was performed in the Pramita laboratory. Following the collection and processing of sample and antigen swab data, IBM SPSS version was utilized to conduct statistical analysis. RESULT(S): The result showed that four of the pregnant women were infected with COVID-19, and they accounted for 2% of the sample population. The health protocol carried out by pregnant women was not significantly related to the swab results. Therefore, vaccination history had no significant association with COVID-19 symptoms, but people who received vaccines had more negative swab test results compared to those who did not, where three out of four positive samples were unvaccinated. CONCLUSION(S): Based on the results, only 2% of pregnant women were infected with COVID-19 at the Community Health Centre in Medan, because this study was carried out when COVID-19 cases had decreased. The statistical analysis results showed that the history of vaccination was not significantly related to SARS-CoV-2 antigen swab results. However, there was a clinical tendency that vaccines can reduce the number of positive cases, where three out of four positive samples were not vaccinated.Copyright © 2023 Sarma Nursani Lumbanraja, Reni Hayati, Khairani Sukatendel, Johny Marpaung, Muhammad Rusda, Edy Ardiansyah.
ABSTRACT
Background. Every life aspect and group of the community have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the group of pregnant, childbirth, and postpartum woman. COVID-19 Pandemic occurred in 2020-2021. Maternal mortality in East Java Province was the highest in Indonesia during the pandemic. Objective. This study analyzed the effect of spatial determinants that consist of antenatal, childbirth, and post-partum care on maternal mortality in East Java Province during the Pandemic. Methods. This study used a crossectional method with the unit of analysis in this study was all pregnant, childbirth and postpartum women in 38 districts of East Java Province from 2020 until 2021. Data were analyzed with spatial regression by using Geographically Weighted Regression Software. Results. Maternal mortality in East Java had a spreading pat-tern and negative value of the diff criterion, so we concluded that there was a spatial influence. The variables of antenatal care, accessibility of healthcare service, third postpartum visit, and complication service had significant effects on maternal mortality in all regions (P<0,05). There were four groups of districts that showed a similarity of significant factors. This result showed that each region's diversity of the accessibility of health services affects maternal mortality during the COVID-19 era. Antenatal services, access to health facilities and complication services affected maternal mortality in regions with high maternal mortality rate. Conclusion. Every region has its spatial determinants of maternal mortality. The top government should give authority to local government to have programs to reduce maternal mortality according to the condition in their region. r.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, policies were implemented that sought to reduce in-person prenatal visits and ultrasounds. We sought to evaluate the effect of those policies on the rate of diagnosed fetal growth restriction and infant low birth weight. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of patients delivered at an academic center. Participants who received prenatal care during the time period of restricted visits were matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients receiving care during an equivalent time period when there were no such restrictions (group I: July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019;and group II: March 23, 2020, to September 23, 2020). Medical records were reviewed for clinical and demographic characteristics. Neonatal morbidity was defined as any of the following: stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low birth weight. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate. P <.05 was significant. RESULTS: Our cohort included 580 patients. Overall, the group had a 13% preterm birth rate, 8.2% were diagnosed with fetal growth restriction, and 26% had the composite neonatal morbidity. All patients in the cohort had at least one ultrasound. Compared to group I, group II had more individuals who had only one ultrasound during the pregnancy (3.1 versus 0%, P =.004), but overall the group had more total ultrasounds performed (1.5 [1–3] versus 1 [1–2], P =.02) and had more patients who required fetal surveillance for maternal and fetal conditions (56 versus 44, P =.014). Group II was more likely to have a neonatal demise (1.4 versus 0.3%, P <.01), but there was no difference in the rate of prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction or low birth weight. CONCLUSION: Policies to reduce prenatal ultrasounds were not effective in reducing ultrasounds performed, and there was no difference in the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction despite an increase in comorbidity. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The traditional medical model of prenatal care may miss opportunities for anticipatory guidance and psychosocial support for pregnant people. We describe Stay Home, Stay Connected (SHSC), a virtual, service-learning, pregnancy support group that supplements routine prenatal care. METHODS: Stay Home, Stay Connected was implemented during the acute COVID-19 pandemic and updated in January 2022 in keeping with relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions. The program consists of monthly small-group sessions with 8–10 pregnant people at similar gestational age, led by an obstetric provider (eg, physician, midwife) and medical, midwifery, and social work students. Recorded group classes on mental health and wellness are available on-demand. In our IRB-exempt assessment of SHSC patients from January 2022 to October 2022, we obtained consent and collected surveys at enrollment and after sessions to assess participants' reasons for joining and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Since program updates, 80 patients have participated in 5 small groups, led by 4 providers and 8 students. Of the 80 patients registered for SHSC, 65 (81%) completed the enrollment survey. The top reasons for joining SHSC were desire for extra support, more information about pregnancy, and connection with other patients. The majority of participants who completed satisfaction surveys, reported sessions were helpful to their learning (32/34, 94%) and feeling supported (25/26, 96%). All participants surveyed reported they would recommend SHSC to other pregnant patients. CONCLUSION: A virtual service-learning pregnancy support group remains feasible and acceptable for participants after the acute COVID-19 pandemic. We are continuing to expand and develop SHSC to fulfill unmet needs in pregnancy. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: To date, not many studies have been conducted to examine the role of COVID-19 on gestation and fetal development. During COVID-19, pregnant women had difficulty accessing prenatal screening and care due to pandemics restrictions and lockdowns. In this retrospective study we aimed to assess the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on fetal development in both prenatal and postnatal outcomes pre-and pre-COVID-19 pandemics in Northern Cyprus. Method(s): A total number of 61 aborted materials were karyotyped during the pre-pandemic period (January 2017 and March 2020) whereas 24 samples were analysed during the peripandemic period (March 2020-November 2021). On the other hand, 25 new-borns blood samples during the pre-pandemic and 44 samples during the pre-pandemic period were analysed. Result(s): No statistically significant difference found in health and abnormal aborted material karyotypes between two periods. On the other hand, a statistical significance was observed in postnatal chromosomal abnormalities (P = 0.04) after two long pandemic lockdowns, which are known as the first and the second waves, dramatically indicating that no baby with Down syndrome was between 2017-2020 whereas seven babies with Down Syndrome were born as consequences of without taking precaution against lockdowns. Conclusion(s): Overall, prenatal care is failed which resulting increased postnatal chromosomal abnormality due to heavy flight restrictions, economic inflation instability, limited access to medical services during COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns in Northern Cyprus.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of preventive measures against COVID-19 infection among pregnant women. It is our understanding that assessing healthcare needs and healthcare education form the pillars for better healthcare thereby this study was conducted. Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in which 150 antenatal women were included. Face-to-face interview was conducted by using a self-developed internally validated semi-structured questionnaire based on 3 major domains, Knowledge (10), Attitude (10) and Practice (4), with close ended questions. Each response-correct was allotted score 1 & incorrect allotted score of 0. The responses were described as frequencies and percentages. Scoring system-Poor score<60%, Fair score 60-75%, Good score > 75% of total score in each domain. Result(s): 103(68.7%) had good knowledge and 121(80.7%) had poor attitude, regarding COVID affecting their pregnancy, antenatal visits and unborn baby. 113(75.3%) were practicing preventive habits. Conclusion(s): Our study showed the anxiety and fear related to Covid-19 affected mental health of women and their adherence to antenatal care which needs to be addressed in providing antenatal care services.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Limited evidence exists on the pandemic's role in limiting access and use of prenatal care services and the quality of care for pregnant women. We aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic restrictions on in-person prenatal care visits (PNCV) and the quality of prenatal care. Method(s): Using the mother-infant-linked administrative health databases in Manitoba, Canada, we conducted a province-wide population-based cohort study among independent pregnancies. We examined the quarterly rates of PNCV before (October 2016-March 2020) and during (April 2020-March 2021) the pandemic. Quality of prenatal care was categorized using the Revised Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index (R-GINDEX) into inadequate (<50% visits), intermediate (50%-80% visits), adequate (>80% visits), intensive (high-risk), and no care. Interrupted time series analyses were conducted to assess the immediate and lagged changes in PNCV and quality of care after the implementation of pandemic restrictions. Result(s): Amongst 70,931 pregnancies, we observed no significant mean difference in the overall numbers of PNCV during the pandemic compared to prepandemic (8.2 vs. 8.6,p=0.0837). Prenatal care utilization was 3.4% inadequate and 34.7% adequate before the pandemic and 4.8% and 26.6% during the pandemic, respectively. Restrictions were associated with an abrupt decline in adequate and intermediate care during the first trimester by 11.3% (p<0.001) and 11.98%, respectively, followed by non-significant change throughout the pandemic (beta3=-0.25,p=0.694 and beta3=-0.96,p=0.192, respectively). Moreover, restrictions were associated with an increased rate of inadequate care during the first (beta2=1.52,p=0.007) and second trimesters (beta2=0.78,p=0.208), and not among third trimesters (beta2=-0.44,p=0.094). During the pandemic, we found no significant differences in the rates of intensive prenatal care during the first (p=0.478), second (p=0.614), and third (p=0.608) trimesters compared to pre-pandemic. Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest a decline in adequacy levels of prenatal care services after COVID-19 restrictions were enacted, with a higher impact on pregnancies during their first and second trimesters. Although the overall adequacy of care decreased, there were no changes to the rates of intensive visits. This study will further investigate the impact of the pandemic on virtual PNCV and assess the association between the quality of prenatal care and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 caused a rapid integration of telehealth into prenatal care. This study aims to assess the effect of telehealth adaptation on timing and severity of the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). METHODS: This is an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of patients with HDP who delivered from April to October of 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2020 (pandemic) at one urban tertiary care center. The primary outcome was mean gestational age at diagnosis of HDP. Secondary outcomes included initial and final severity of diagnosis before delivery. Results were adjusted for baseline characteristics different at P <.10, using multivariable logistic regression and ANCOVA as appropriate. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-eight patients were included, with 231 from 2019 and 267 from 2020. 17.1% had preeclampsia with severe features initially, and 29.3% met these criteria by delivery. In 2020, 80.5% of patients used telehealth (versus 0.9% in 2019), doing so for a mean of 29% of prenatal appointments. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed no significant difference in gestational age at diagnosis or diagnosis severity between cohorts. In the adjusted analysis, Black race was significantly associated with initial diagnosis severity (odds ratio [OR] 1.7 [1.0–2.8], P =.046);telehealth use as represented by cohort year was not (0.9 [0.5–1.3], P =.54). Black race (OR 2.6 [1.6–4.3], P <.001), non-Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.4 [0.2–0.8], P =.04), and body mass index (OR 1.04 [1.0–1.1], P =.005) were significantly associated with final diagnosis severity;telehealth use was not (OR 1.0 [0.6–1.4], P =.87). CONCLUSION: The adaptation of telehealth is not associated with a change in timing or severity of diagnosis of HDP. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prenatal care, one of the most common preventive care services in the United States, endeavors to improve pregnancy outcomes through evidence-based screenings and interventions. Despite the prevalence of prenatal care and its importance to maternal and infant health, there are several debates about the best methods of prenatal care delivery, including the most appropriate schedule frequency and content of prenatal visits. Current US national guidelines recommend that low-risk individuals receive a standard schedule of 12 to 14 in-office visits, a care delivery model that has remained unchanged for almost a century. OBJECTIVE: In early 2020, to mitigate individuals' exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, prenatal care providers implemented new paradigms that altered the schedule frequency, interval, and modality (eg, telemedicine) of how prenatal care services were offered. In this paper, we describe the development of a core outcome set (COS) that can be used to evaluate the effect of the frequency of prenatal care schedules on maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: We will systematically review the literature to identify previously reported outcomes important to individuals who receive prenatal care and the people who care for them. Stakeholders with expertise in prenatal care delivery (ie, patients or family members, health care providers, and public health professionals and policy makers) will rate the importance of identified outcomes in a web-based survey using a 3-round Delphi process. A digital consensus meeting will be held for a group of stakeholder representatives to discuss and vote on the outcomes to include in the final COS. RESULTS: The Delphi survey was initiated in July 2022 with invited 71 stakeholders. A digital consensus conference was conducted on October 11, 2022. Data are currently under analysis with plans to submit them in a subsequent manuscript. CONCLUSIONS: More research about the optimal schedule frequency and modality for prenatal care delivery is needed. Standardizing outcomes that are measured and reported in evaluations of the recommended prenatal care schedules will assist evidence synthesis and results reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall, this COS will expand the consistency and patient-centeredness of reported outcomes for various prenatal care delivery schedules and modalities, hopefully improving the overall efficacy of recommended care delivery for pregnant people and their families. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43962.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report results of the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey (ENP) in metropolitan France and assess trends in the main indicators of perinatal health, medical practices, and risk factors in France since 1995. POPULATION AND METHOD: All the samples included all women giving birth at a gestational age of at least 22 weeks of gestation and/or to an infant weighing at least 500 grams in all maternity units in metropolitan France during one week in 1995 (N=13 048), 2003 (N=14 324), 2010 (N=14 546), 2016 (N=12 553), and 2021 (N=12 088). The data came from postpartum interviews of the women at the hospital and their medical records. Comparisons between surveys showed trends over time. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2021, maternal characteristics changed. Maternal age and the frequency of women with obesity rose: in 2021, 24.6% of women were 35 years or older (21.1% in 2016, 19.2% in 2010, 15.9% in 2003 and 12.4% in 1995) and 14.4% were obese (11.8% in 2016, 9.9% in 2010 and 7.4% in 2003). Some antenatal prevention behaviors that improved in 2021 were not smoking during the third trimester, acid folic administration before pregnancy, and vaccination against influenza. The percentage of women with an early prenatal appointment ("4th month appointment"), implemented to facilitate screening of maternal vulnerability during pregnancy, has continued to rise. The percentage of women receiving prenatal care by midwives has risen markedly (39.0% in 2021 versus 11.7% in 2016). Serum screening for Down syndrome continues to increase (91.8% of women in 2021). The rate of induction of labor has risen significantly (20.2% in 1995 and 25.8% in 2021). The mode of delivery has not varied significantly since 2003; in 2021, the cesarean rate was 21.4% and the instrumental vaginal delivery rate 12.4%. Episiotomy was increasingly rare, among both primiparous and multiparous women (16.5% and 2.9% in 2021, respectively). The prevalence of coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) infection during pregnancy was 5.7%. Preterm live births increased regularly, slightly but significantly over the 1995-2016 period and then remained stable between 2016 and 2021 (7.0%). In 2021, 56.3% of women exclusively breastfed during their hospital stay, a modest increase in comparison with 2016 (54.6%). CONCLUSION: Routine national perinatal surveys highlight positive trends over time in some preventive practices, decreases in some medical interventions consistent with national guidelines, and the increasing role of midwives in prenatal care. Nonetheless, some indicators remain less than optimal and require more detailed analyses.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , RNA, Viral , Pregnancy , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Parturition , Delivery, ObstetricABSTRACT
Introduction: Telehealth use in obstetrics has been demonstrated to improve efficiency, access to care, and pregnancy outcomes. Despite reported successful implementation of these programs, information regarding the program variations and its impact on health care costs and outcomes are scarce. Methods: This is a scoping review of pregnancy-related telehealth studies to understand the current landscape of pregnancy-related telehealth interventions as well as to subset those that are used in high-risk pregnancies. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to guide this review. Results: A total of 70 articles were included in this scoping review. Of those, 53 (75.7%) studies included a pregnant population and 17 (24.3%) studies focused on a rural and/or urban population. Most studies (n = 56; 80%) included some form of synchronous interaction between provider and participant. Patient outcomes included maternal/infant health outcomes (n = 41; 44.1%), patient satisfaction (n = 9; 9.7%), and attendance/compliance (n = 5; 5.4%). Provider-level outcomes included knowledge change (n = 11; 11.8%) and self-efficacy (n = 3; 3.2%). Other outcomes included assessment of costs and patient/provider feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Overall, there has been a growing trend in articles published on pregnancy-related telehealth studies since 2011, with 2018 having the most publications in a single year. Conclusion: This review suggests a steadily growing body of literature on pregnancy-related telehealth interventions; however, more research is needed to better understand outcomes of telehealth for pregnancy-related care, especially related to patient satisfaction, health disparities, and cost-benefit.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 caused a rapid integration of telehealth into prenatal care. This raises questions about the ability to screen for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy when caring for patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of telehealth adaptation on the timing and severity of diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy who delivered from April 2019 to October 2019 (before the pandemic) and April 2020 to October 2020 (during the pandemic) at 1 urban tertiary care center. The primary outcome was mean gestational age at diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The secondary outcomes included severity of diagnosis, both initially and at the time of delivery. The results were adjusted for baseline characteristic difference at P<.10, using multivariable logistic regression and analysis of covariance, as appropriate. The sample size was calculated based on a previous cohort study of patients who developed preeclampsia, with a mean gestational age at delivery of 36.3 weeks and a standard deviation of 2.8 weeks. A sample size of 124 patients would be needed per group to detect a gestational age difference of 1 week with 80% power and a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Overall, 498 patients were included, with 231 from 2019 and 267 from 2020. Of note, 17.1% of patients had preeclampsia with severe features initially, and 29.3% of patients met the criteria at delivery. In 2020, 80.5% of patients used telehealth (vs 0.9% of patients in 2019), doing so for a mean of 29.0% of prenatal appointments. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed no significant difference in gestational age at diagnosis or diagnosis severity between cohorts. In the adjusted analysis, cohort year was not significantly associated with severity of initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.39; P=.53) or severity of diagnosis at delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.46; P=.87). However, Black race was significantly associated with increased risk of having severe preeclampsia at initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.85; P=.046). In addition, Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-4.28; P<.001), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.82; P=.01), and initial body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06; P=.005) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of severe preeclampsia at delivery. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of telehealth was not associated with delays in the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or with increased severity of diagnoses.
ABSTRACT
Background: The peak of the COVID-19 pandemic led to decreased maternal and child health care engagement, especially among marginalized populations. Existing disparities in prenatal care access and quality faced by pregnant immigrant people are likely to be amplified by the pandemic. Materials and Methods: We conducted a study with direct service providers (DSPs) at community-based organizations (CBOs) serving pregnant immigrant families in the Philadelphia region. Semistructured interviews addressed barriers and facilitators to prenatal health care access and engagement among immigrant families both before and then after the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Additional questions elicited context about the demographics of service populations, organizational connectedness to health care providers, and pandemic-related operational changes. Results: Between June and November 2021, 10 interviews were conducted in English and Spanish with DSPs at 5 CBOs. Primary themes included diminished access and quality of care received due to decreased language accessibility, increased restrictions around support persons, shifts to telemedicine, and changes to appointment scheduling. Additional themes included heightened hesitancy engaging with services due to documentation status, confusion around legal rights, financial strain, and health insurance status. Interviewees provided suggestions for improving service access during and postpandemic for immigrant pregnant people, including implementation of culturally responsive group prenatal care, institutional policies to improve understanding of legal rights, and increased financial supports. Conclusions: Understanding emergent and exacerbated barriers to prenatal care access and quality during the COVID-19 pandemic provides context for how to improve health equity for immigrant pregnant people through public health and health care policies as the pandemic continues, and once it has subsided.
ABSTRACT
Intro: COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective at reducing risk of severe COVID-19 among pregnant women, a group at higher risk of severe disease. However, vaccine uptake has been slow among people in Zambia. We sought to describe vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Zambia. Method(s): We conducted serial cross-sectional surveys among pregnant women attending first antenatal care visits in one rural and two urban districts of Zambia from December 2021 through June 2022. Ten health facilities per district were randomly selected and a convenience sample of 20 women per facility per month were recruited. Consenting participants were administered an electronic questionnaire asking about offers and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. Finding(s): In total, 3,652 women were recruited from December 2021 to June 2022, and 82.4% had not received a COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine coverage among participants rose from 10.5% in December 2021 to 28.7% in June 2022 (p<0.01). During the same period, the proportion of women who reported being offered a vaccine rose significantly from 22.4% to 52.5% (p<0.01), with a non-significant increase in the proportion of women who were unvaccinated but willing to accept a vaccine (58.0% to 65.8%, p=0.59). Among 785 women who were unvaccinated and not willing to accept a vaccine, 42.3% were concerned about the safety of vaccination during pregnancy. Conclusion(s): Vaccine coverage among pregnant women in Zambia remains low and safety concerns during pregnancy are high. Door-to-door vaccination campaigns and individual vaccination consultations at all healthcare encounters may increase the number of women being offered a vaccine. Focused safety messaging for pregnant women may help to alleviate fears and increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Pregnant individuals are at increased risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalization and death, and primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for this population. Method(s): Among a cohort of pregnant individuals who received prenatal care at 3 healthcare systems in the United States, we estimated the cumulative incidence of hospitalization with symptomatic COVID-19 illness. We also identified factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with pregnancy weeks as the timescale and a time-varying adjustor that accounted for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 circulation;model covariates included site, age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, prepregnancy weight status, and selected underlying medical conditions. Data were collected primarily through medical record extraction. Result(s): Among 19 456 pregnant individuals with an estimated due date during 1 March 2020-28 February 2021, 75 (0.4%) were hospitalized with symptomatic COVID-19. Factors associated with hospitalization for symptomatic COVID-19 were Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.3-5.5]), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander race (aHR, 12 [95% CI, 3.2-45.5]), age <25 years (aHR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.3-7.6]), prepregnancy obesity (aHR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1-3.9]), diagnosis of a metabolic disorder (aHR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.8]), lung disease excluding asthma (aHR, 49 [95% CI, 28-84]), and cardiovascular disease (aHR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.5-4.7]). Conclusion(s): Although hospitalization with symptomatic COVID-19 was uncommon, pregnant individuals should be aware of risk factors associated with severe illness when considering COVID-19 vaccination. Copyright © 2022 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
ABSTRACT
Background: Monash Health implemented a new telehealth-integrated antenatal care schedule in March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given ever-increasing healthcare costs, new interventions must be evaluated to ensure value for money. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective comparative cost analysis from the health service and patient perspective. Women with a singleton pregnancy who received antenatal care and gave birth at Monash Health from 1 January 2018 to 22 March 2020 (pre-telehealth) and 20 April 2020 to 31 December 2021 (post-telehealth) were included. We generated propensity score matched pre- and post-telehealth cohorts, balancing baseline characteristics and comorbidities. We assigned costs for all episodes of care at Monash Health and calculated the average cost per birth in each cohort. Travel costs were estimated using the average travel distance and time. Result(s): Matched pre- and post-telehealth cohorts (both n = 13 534) were generated from the pre-telehealth ( n = 18 628) and post-telehealth ( n = 14 137) populations. We found an AU$122 increase per birth, for a total cost of AU$12 069 per birth post-telehealth. This was mainly driven by an AU$188 per birth increase in outpatient costs, associated with an extra half an appointment per birth, but offset by an AU$99 per birth decrease in patient travel costs. Differences in clinical outcomes are described in Table 1. Conclusion(s): Telehealth-integrated antenatal care enabled the health service to provide safe, ongoing care for more complex pregnancies during the pandemic for only a minimal cost increase. The results highlight the need for more research into obstetric telehealth, including more comprehensive valuations of benefits and costs to all stakeholders.
ABSTRACT
Researchers have found that women who deliver babies in the midst of a pandemic are more likely to have mental health consequences, including postpartum depression, and their infants are likely to suffer as well, if the stressors are not mitigated. The cohort study of 318 mothers in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom found that COVID‐related stress was significantly associated with poor postpartum mental health and increased negative affectivity among infants.